![]() Don’t try to vector render the whole model.This will fix the issue of switching pages until you manually update the model. Loose geometry and not modeling everything on layer 0.Not setting up scenes correctly and how to use the attributes to toggle parameters between multiple scenes with a single click ( like aligning scenes for viewport stacking).Too many layers and not understanding nesting groups.Typically the biggest problems I see users do are the following: Scrapbooks are very powerful and can be used to set up so much more than just standard notes and symbols. Each template has your scenes, layers, font types, dimension styles etc preset and ready to go. The other files contain the main model as a reference and the only thing you are doing in the sub-models is placing section planes and setting scenes.Īlso, setting up your standard templates for both SU and LO is extremely efficient so you aren’t starting from scratch each time. Yes I use multiple models to convey different drawing types, but there is only one model that is edited. Someone commented on the use of multiple models being a recipe for disaster. ![]() ACAD, DataCAD and Revit are the complete opposite. I of course want to see improvements in speed, but I don’t want the simplicity to change. SU and LO are very simple programs which is their greatest strength. My one recommendation that I still stand by today is to forget what you learned with ACAD if you want to be proficient with SU and LO. I’m going to date myself, but I was trained in hand drafting until ACAD first came out. Obviously we all got our start with some type of CAD program, typically ACAD. The methods I use work for any type of project. To a beast that costs north of $5000.00 and a forced subscription model with the learning curve that’s practically vertical. I think we need to remember we are comparing a program that’s costs what $695.00 plus $120.00 a year. But I have no way of controlling the shape of the tag without more intervention. I also am able to tag some objects like my doors, and windows by using the “Instance” and the leader to extract the instance number. I have managed to get my door, window and room schedules through the report generator and import them into layout but it’s cumbersome. I have managed to create some pretty good looking plans with layout but I know I could have done the same work in a fraction of the time in my Autodesk Products. The only reason I use it is because of how much I love Sketchup and am sick to death of Autodesk after 30 plus years of using their products.$$$$$ I have a love / hate relationship with it. I’ll be the first to admit LO is a P.I.T.A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |